• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Harmful Masculinities and the Threat to Force Readiness in the U.S. Military

daftandbarmy

Army.ca Dinosaur
Reaction score
28,138
Points
1,160
Well, good luck with that Uncle Sam (good thing that's a gender neutral name ;) )

Harmful Masculinities and the Threat to Force Readiness in the U.S. Military​


Download the Executive Summary
Download the full report

Executive Summary

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Force are not taking the threat of rigid masculine norms seriously enough. The Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) agenda and the integration of women into combat roles have become important elements in the DoD’s efforts to improve operational effectiveness and unit cohesion. However, the reticence to talk about masculinities and male trauma fails to account for how harmful gender norms shape military policy and culture – impacting the safety and wellbeing of all Service members.

As the threat of nuclear war in Ukraine increases and tensions with China continue to mount, the modern security landscape is exerting outsized pressure on the DoD to shore up its response to poor troop maintenance, including issues with recruitment and retention. Notably, metastasizing internal health crises that also harm men, including astronomical rates of suicide, drug and alcohol use, and sexual assault, threaten the stability of force readiness. An analysis of U.S. military culture that focuses on power dynamics and attitudes around manhood can help to make the connections between issues with force readiness and the gendered components of trauma, culture, and mental health.

Within the U.S. military, rigid masculine gender norms that exalt stoicism and devalue emotionality – due to fear of being perceived as weak – often inhibit men’s ability to properly cope with trauma. The heightened pressure to appear unaffected by traumatic events and limited access to critical health services such as psychologists and counselors can result in a lack of help-seeking behavior and an increased likelihood to perpetrate violence, particularly for men. Military constructions of gender have deleterious effects not only on the individual health and well-being of Service members and veterans but also on the military’s ability to recruit and retain personnel.

Despite progress in recent years to address gender-related issues in the military, including the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military investigations into sexual assault and harassment in the force and implementation of WPS mandates, such approaches too often are just a temporary solution. Investments into masculinities-informed gender analysis that unearths the root causes of violence serve to counteract the denial and neglect of men’s mental health and psychosocial needs. Today’s geopolitical realities and the cultural challenges of Department and Joint Force internal culture necessitate a comprehensive structural response within the DoD that broadens the conception of gender in security beyond “women’s issues.”

Key Takeaways:
  • Widely held gender norms that shape men’s beliefs around what it means to be a man – including aggression, physical dominance, and heroism – are central to many interpretations of masculinity. While these norms and values can differ across time, culture, and context, certain assumptions of manhood are central features to militaries globally.
  • The pressure to perform in high-stress environments, such as during special forces training, results in many Service members, often men, turning to substance use as performance enhancers to meet physical demands or as a palliative for trauma or injury.
  • Tens of thousands of active-duty personnel and veterans who have served in the military since 9/11 have died by suicide. Mental health, PTSD, and access to psychosocial support have an immediate effect on military recruitment. Data released in 2021 suggested that almost one-third of potential recruits were worried about potential sexual assault if they joined the military, while stark rates of suicide continue to send shockwaves throughout service communities and beyond.
  • There is a growing recognition among academia, international organizations, and civil society of the critical links between misogyny and radical extremism in the military – which are not being adequately addressed by the DoD.
  • The Department of Defense briefly referenced the need to consider masculinities in the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military. An upcoming Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee must have a rigorous gender analysis with a masculinities approach to effectively address suicide in military and veteran communities.
Key Policy Recommendations:
  • Carry out the recommended research as laid out in the Independent Review Commission Recommendations on Countering Sexual Assault in the Military.
  • Conduct a thorough gender analysis on the upcoming Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee currently being carried out at DoD.
  • Conduct a gender analysis with a clear masculinities approach on all high-level policy documents related to national security and defense policy.
  • Provide deeper and more sustained investment in mental health services and resources for Service members, including greater availability of counselors and psychologists.
  • Include a masculinities approach in DoD efforts to affect positive internal cultural change in order to encourage men’s help-seeking behavior and shift norms around mental health stigma.

 
Well, good luck with that Uncle Sam (good thing that's a gender neutral name ;) )

Harmful Masculinities and the Threat to Force Readiness in the U.S. Military​


Download the Executive Summary
Download the full report

Executive Summary

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Force are not taking the threat of rigid masculine norms seriously enough. The Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) agenda and the integration of women into combat roles have become important elements in the DoD’s efforts to improve operational effectiveness and unit cohesion. However, the reticence to talk about masculinities and male trauma fails to account for how harmful gender norms shape military policy and culture – impacting the safety and wellbeing of all Service members.

As the threat of nuclear war in Ukraine increases and tensions with China continue to mount, the modern security landscape is exerting outsized pressure on the DoD to shore up its response to poor troop maintenance, including issues with recruitment and retention. Notably, metastasizing internal health crises that also harm men, including astronomical rates of suicide, drug and alcohol use, and sexual assault, threaten the stability of force readiness. An analysis of U.S. military culture that focuses on power dynamics and attitudes around manhood can help to make the connections between issues with force readiness and the gendered components of trauma, culture, and mental health.

Within the U.S. military, rigid masculine gender norms that exalt stoicism and devalue emotionality – due to fear of being perceived as weak – often inhibit men’s ability to properly cope with trauma. The heightened pressure to appear unaffected by traumatic events and limited access to critical health services such as psychologists and counselors can result in a lack of help-seeking behavior and an increased likelihood to perpetrate violence, particularly for men. Military constructions of gender have deleterious effects not only on the individual health and well-being of Service members and veterans but also on the military’s ability to recruit and retain personnel.

Despite progress in recent years to address gender-related issues in the military, including the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military investigations into sexual assault and harassment in the force and implementation of WPS mandates, such approaches too often are just a temporary solution. Investments into masculinities-informed gender analysis that unearths the root causes of violence serve to counteract the denial and neglect of men’s mental health and psychosocial needs. Today’s geopolitical realities and the cultural challenges of Department and Joint Force internal culture necessitate a comprehensive structural response within the DoD that broadens the conception of gender in security beyond “women’s issues.”

Key Takeaways:
  • Widely held gender norms that shape men’s beliefs around what it means to be a man – including aggression, physical dominance, and heroism – are central to many interpretations of masculinity. While these norms and values can differ across time, culture, and context, certain assumptions of manhood are central features to militaries globally.
  • The pressure to perform in high-stress environments, such as during special forces training, results in many Service members, often men, turning to substance use as performance enhancers to meet physical demands or as a palliative for trauma or injury.
  • Tens of thousands of active-duty personnel and veterans who have served in the military since 9/11 have died by suicide. Mental health, PTSD, and access to psychosocial support have an immediate effect on military recruitment. Data released in 2021 suggested that almost one-third of potential recruits were worried about potential sexual assault if they joined the military, while stark rates of suicide continue to send shockwaves throughout service communities and beyond.
  • There is a growing recognition among academia, international organizations, and civil society of the critical links between misogyny and radical extremism in the military – which are not being adequately addressed by the DoD.
  • The Department of Defense briefly referenced the need to consider masculinities in the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military. An upcoming Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee must have a rigorous gender analysis with a masculinities approach to effectively address suicide in military and veteran communities.
Key Policy Recommendations:
  • Carry out the recommended research as laid out in the Independent Review Commission Recommendations on Countering Sexual Assault in the Military.
  • Conduct a thorough gender analysis on the upcoming Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee currently being carried out at DoD.
  • Conduct a gender analysis with a clear masculinities approach on all high-level policy documents related to national security and defense policy.
  • Provide deeper and more sustained investment in mental health services and resources for Service members, including greater availability of counselors and psychologists.
  • Include a masculinities approach in DoD efforts to affect positive internal cultural change in order to encourage men’s help-seeking behavior and shift norms around mental health stigma.

I think they should focus on making them self-identify as pets instead:

20221210_013134.jpg

20221210_013117.jpg

Sure, dress like a puppy in your military uniform and openly display your fetish for all to see, yet me being "Stoic" is supposed to be bad?

Give me a break 🤣
 
I thought removing emotion from decision making (especially military decision making) was a good thing?
 
Oh you haven't seen that yet. 😁

There are a few US Army Officers who apparently self-id as "pups". It's a sado-masochist fetish thing.

That's ok in 2022 but heaven forbid you or I try and act like a man 🤣

I thought removing emotion from decision making (especially military decision making) was a good thing?

Canadian Comedy GIF by CBC
 
Oh you haven't seen that yet. 😁

There are a few US Army Officers who apparently self-id as "pups". It's a sado-masochist fetish thing.

That's ok in 2022 but heaven forbid you or I try and act like a man 🤣



Canadian Comedy GIF by CBC
The ending of Old Yeller comes to mind.
 
Well, that took a weird turn.

Maybe it's a poor report title, but their goal seems to be the same as Movember etc to get men specifically to start talking about mental health and not bottling it up, and if they can do that I think it would be good.

They probably want to totally change how they present the arguement though as the way they were presenting it will be counterproductive, and is full of jargon making it sound they want to turn everyone into 'sissy soy boys' or whatever pejorative works for you. Talking about things and admitting you are struggling takes a lot more courage/strength then just pretending things are fine IMHO.
 
Well, I think we can safely say Biden solved the toxic masculinity problem in the military. They're all fembots and fanboys now.
 
Well, I think we can safely say Biden solved the toxic masculinity problem in the military. They're all fembots and fanboys now.
That's an interesting take, since another female US Army soldier died in Fort Hood 2 weeks ago, and her parents said that she was repeatedly sexually harassed by peers and one of her superiors.

Fort Hood was also the place where Pvt Vanessa Guillen was murdered in 2020.

 
That's an interesting take, since another female US Army soldier died in Fort Hood 2 weeks ago, and her parents said that she was repeatedly sexually harassed by peers and one of her superiors.

Fort Hood was also the place where Pvt Vanessa Guillen was murdered in 2020.

If I am not mistaken the Commander of Fort Hood was relieved of his command.

IIRC several murders have taken place there.
 
Thought this was pretty good by Jordan Peterson.

I wanted to give 2 thumbs up. One for St. Jordan and one for Sir Merle. My Dad had that Merle Haggard Tribute album to Jimmie Rodgers and he played it over and over. 2 thumbs up!
 
I remember reading a line somewhere - "Lead me not into temptation"

Alternate reading - "Don't make me decide! I might choose to do the wrong thing!"
 
Yes, but I think this was after the new Comd came in.

Culture eats strategy for breakfast... and sometimes kills people too:


#IAmVanessaGuillen documentary explores the culture of toxicity at Fort Hood​


Guillén's killing also prompted officials to take a closer look at the culture of the base, which had seen a string of other deaths and disappearances. An Army review conducted after Guillén's death found profound issues at Fort Hood, including a command climate "permissive of sexual harassment and sexual assault," and disciplined more than a dozen leaders as a result.


 
Back
Top